The Codex
Glossary
Act 2. Repeatable Candles

The Load

IFRA 51 caps, family by family, without the marketing.

Candle formulation is drowning in folklore. Twelve percent is better than ten percent. Coconut throws harder than soy. A pinch of stearic acid fixes everything. Some of that is true in narrow conditions. Most of it is repeated because it sounds like expertise.

This section replaces the folklore with three curves and one matrix. Once you can read them, you can predict a recipe on paper before you pour it.

The load bell curve

Hot throw does not scale linearly with fragrance load. In my own tests it rises from around four percent, tends to peak in the eight to ten percent range for most soy container blends, and then falls as the wax loses the ability to hold and release the extra oil. The curve on this spread is drawn from repeated test-pours in my own workshop, not from a published data set. It is why a candle at twelve percent often throws worse than the same candle at ten.

The peak shifts by wax. In my tests coconut apricot blends have tended to peak a little higher, and paraffin often a little lower, which surprises people. Treat the numbers as a starting point and find the peak for your specific wax and fragrance before you fight them.

Cure curves by wax

Paraffin plateaus at day seven. Coconut blends hit their stride at day ten. Soy is still improving at day twenty-one. If you judge all three at day fourteen, paraffin looks best and soy looks flat. Judge each wax on its own timeline or you will keep choosing paraffin for the wrong reasons.

Wax choice on evidence

The wax comparison matrix scores five common waxes on adhesion, throw, ease of use, cost per kilo, and sustainability. There is no winner. Soy wins on sustainability and loses on speed. Paraffin wins on throw and loses on marketing. Coconut wins on the balance and loses on the price per kilo.

Pick the wax that fits the story you can honestly tell about your brand, then run the load bell for that specific wax. Do not chase the wax an Instagram maker with different economics is chasing.

Nose fatigue is real

You cannot smell your own candles after twenty minutes. The receptors saturate and you start rating everything as weak. The nose fatigue clock on this page is my cheat sheet. Test in the first ten minutes of walking into the room, or after a fifteen-minute break with a cup of coffee. Never test back to back.

Formulation is measurement plus patience. Skip either one and you are guessing in a lab coat.
8–10%
Soy peak throw load·
per SDS
IFRA Cat 12 ceiling (per material, not universal)·

Wax family library

The matrix below distils the manufacturer TDS values that actually drive a formulation decision. Melt point governs your pour window. Recommended maximum load caps your bell curve. Cure plateau tells you when to judge the candle. Congeal point predicts how quickly the top skins and where you will need a heat gun.

Container wax reference matrix
Cargill NatureWax C-3 (soy)
Melt 50°C. Max load 10%. Cure 14–21 d. Pour 60–68°C. Adhesion soft, throw mid.
CandleScience Golden Wax 464 (soy)
Melt 47°C. Max load 12%. Cure 10–14 d. Pour 57–63°C. Frosts more than C-3.
Kerax KeraSoy 4130 (soy)
Melt 47°C. Max load 10%. Cure 10–14 d. Pour 60–70°C. UK/EU staple; pair first with 4Candles CL, TB or TCR before Stabilo/CD.
Coconut-apricot blend
Melt 52°C. Max load 12%. Cure 7–10 d. Pour 60–65°C. Best cold throw of the five.
Paraffin 4794 blend
Melt 57°C. Max load 12%. Cure 5–7 d. Pour 70–77°C. Highest hot throw ceiling.
Source:

Cure plateaus, in numbers

You do not have to trust the curves on the facing page. The plateaus are documented on the manufacturer sheets. Judge each wax on its own timeline and the wax comparison stops feeling like a personality test.

21days
Soy cure plateau·
10days
Coconut blend cure plateau·
7days
Paraffin cure plateau·

Scent throw diagnostics

Weak throw is almost never a fragrance-quality problem. It is a wax problem, a load problem, a cure problem, or a wick problem, in that order. Work down the matrix before you email the supplier.

Scent throw failure matrix
SymptomLikely causeFixPrevent
No hot throw, strong cold throwWick under-sized. Melt pool too shallow to volatilise oil.Move up one wick size and re-run the 4-burn protocol.Confirm melt pool reaches 8 mm12 mm by burn three.
No cold throwUnder-cured, or load below the bell curve threshold.Wait to the wax's plateau. If still flat, raise load by 1% and re-pour.Log day 7 / 14 / 21 sniff scores per wax.
Fragrance seeping to the surfaceLoad above the wax's binding ceiling, or added outside the supplier's recommended addition temperature without a full 2-minute stir.Drop load 1% and add fragrance at 82°C. Stir two full minutes.Never exceed the TDS maximum. Time the stir with a phone timer.
Discoloured top or amber haloVanillin or high-molecular-weight aromatic; UV or oxidation.Add UV inhibitor at 0.1% or move to opaque vessel.Flag vanillin-heavy fragrances on the batch record.
Fragrance smells muddy after a weekTwo top-note fragrances competing, or IFRA Cat 12 breach dulling character.Re-check the IFRA certificate for the specific material and cap accordingly.Keep a single top-note lead per candle. Chase depth with base notes, not more top.

The fragrance is not the recipe. The wax, the load, the cure and the wick are the recipe. Fragrance is what the recipe carries.

Waxverse Studio
Figure · cure-curves
Cure curves by waxLine chart with days on the horizontal axis and hot-throw rating on the vertical axis. Four lines, one per wax, show how each peaks at a different point in the cure period.Hot throw over a 14-day cure13710140%25%50%75%100%Days since pourThrowSoy 464 (US)KeraSoy 4130 (EU)Coconut blendParaffin 4630Rapeseed-coco
Cure curves. Hot-throw intensity over fourteen days for soy 464, coconut blend, paraffin 4630 and rapeseed-coco.
Figure · fragrance-load-bell
Fragrance load against throwBell-shaped curve with fragrance load percentage on the horizontal axis and perceived hot-throw on the vertical axis. The peak is annotated at the ten percent mark.Why 10% often beats 12% on soy4%6%8%10%12%14%peakFragrance loadHot throwSweet spot ≈ 10%
Fragrance load against throw. A bell curve showing why ten percent often beats twelve on most soys.
Figure · wax-comparison
Wax comparison matrixComparison matrix with rows for each wax type and columns for adhesion, throw, ease of use, cost per kilo and sustainability. Each cell carries a one-to-five icon rating.Wax compared on the five things that matterAdhesionThrowEaseCostSustainabilitySoy US (GB 464 / C-3)Soy EU (KeraSoy 4130)Coconut blendParaffin (IGI 4630)ParasoyRapeseed-cocoBeeswax
Wax comparison matrix. Icon ratings for adhesion, throw, ease, cost and sustainability.
Figure · fo-ratio-visual
Fragrance load arithmeticFragrance oil per one kilo of wax at six, eight, ten and twelve percent load.60 g6%80 g8%100 g10%120 g12%Per 1 kg wax. Load = grams FO / grams wax.
The fragrance load arithmetic. Bar chart showing the grams of fragrance for a one-kilo batch at six, eight, ten and twelve percent.
Figure · additive-effect
What additives actually doThree pairs of candles showing the same recipe with and without each additive.USAPoor adhesionGlass sticks clean
Add 1% by wax weight. Retest a full burn cycle after.
Coconut oilWeak throwLouder throw, softer top
Add 1% by wax weight. Retest a full burn cycle after.
VybarFrosted topSmoother top, less throw
Add 1% by wax weight. Retest a full burn cycle after.
What additives actually do. Before and after photos with and without USA, coconut oil and vybar.
Figure · nose-fatigue-clock
Nose fatigue clockA 20-minute arc on a clock face with the three-step nose reset protocol.20 minReset protocol1. Sniff coffee beans2. Leave the room3. Return after 20 min
The nose-fatigue clock. Twenty-minute timer with the reset rule: coffee beans, leave the room, come back.